If I Could Be The Education Secretary…

With the General Election just around the corner I thought this would be a good time to remind the future Education Secretary (Ed Sec) about what is important in education up to the age of 16. More importantly the type of curriculum that I believe would lead to academically and vocationally skilled learners for the 21st Century.

THIS particular journey will start in KS2 with project style learning which will engage and promote enquiry in learners. KS2 will be joined up with KS3 as a transitional stage which will develop the young person for their choices at KS4.


The diagram (above) shows what a learner focused learning environment would look like. This would be followed throughout KS2 and into KS3 to further develop skills and allow a smoother transition from primary to secondary education. This will develop the learner to become more effective as an independent learner, in making choices and in their personal development. They would become better at academic learning i.e. knowledge, vocational learning and for their future workplace through skills learning being started at a much earlier stage in their development. Ultimately this would mean that a young person would be a better learner and so, long term, would gain better grades in their academic or vocational subjects at KS4.

I know that this works with young people. I have developed project learning through KS2 to KS3 transition programmes and also into KS4. I have done this throughout 11 years while working as an Assistant Headteacher and then National Development Co-ordinator (ASDAN) creating curriculum programmes across a very wide ability range. The key focus is that a leader of learning (teacher) sets the scene for young people which encourages engagement and personal enquiry through the project they are working on. It is important that the leader of learning facilitates the project and allows the young person to make their own decisions about learning which would engage them in the project. It is also about making learning fun and active for the young person, while relating it to a real world context. To enhance this real world context, I would encourage schools to create lasting partnerships with local communities and employers to encourage entrepreneurship and life skills development.

A few quotes which may show that this method of learning works;

“The most important thing about education is appetite” Winston S Churchill

“I am always ready to learn, but I do not always like being taught” Winston S Churchill

“The object of education is to prepare the young to educate themselves throughout their lives” Robert Maynard Hutchins

If I were the Ed Sec I would create educational policy around project and skills development learning in KS2 and KS3. This would be about having cross-curricular projects where the young person has the opportunity to take more responsibility for decision making and their own learning.

In KS4 students would be given optional pathways that they could pursue. This would allow them to access an academic ‘EBacc’ type pathway, a more vocational ‘Tech Bacc’ type pathway or even a mixture of the two. We must not forget a small cohort who may not be able to access either type of pathway. This could be due to other specific needs that they may have. For these students ‘Life skills’ would be a focus for their learning (if appropriate). I would seriously consider the benefits of having a mandatory Extended Project (EPQ) for ALL young people within KS4 education. This would be designed, and be flexible enough, to be adapted for different learner abilities. Personal Development learning would also be featured as an integral part of the KS4 curriculum whichever pathway is chosen.

School leadership and teachers would be trusted to make these decisions for the benefit of their own schools, community and cohort of learners that they serve. The decision for which type of pathway a specific student should follow would be decided through a collaborative decision made by teachers, parents and most importantly the child. Thorough guidance must be sought from outside bodies to ensure that these decisions would be made in the best interest of each individual young person. The funding that is made available to schools should be used to ensure that the curriculum could be tailored to the varying needs of students. After all every child has different needs and interests, and a ‘one size fits all curriculum’ is a recipe for disaster.

As an ED Sec I would listen to what the professionals are telling me. I would enforce OFSTED to become an organisation that truly supports, rather than judges, schools with a new value that they are a ‘critical friend’. This would be a shift away from being the ‘all high and mighty’ they are perceived as now. OFSTED would work in true collaboration with the government and schools to aid self-improvement of each school.

As an ED Sec I would also take the focus away from data and exceeding expected target grades which has turned our education system into a test and exam driven factory. I would use the data that is collected on each child to guide leadership thinking for curriculum planning for each child. I would not share this data with children, as this in many cases will lower expectations. For example; The target grade for a young person is X, they then achieve this in a test and take their foot of the pedal. In effect lowering expectation as they will have achieved what they should have done.

Why not have the starting point as the top grade achievable for EVERY learner in the APPROPRIATE courses they have chosen? That is truly aspirational! Then if they fall shorter then so be it… the chances are that they will have over achieved anyway on their target.

As an Ed Sec, and using the formula that I outlined, I would certainly be ‘Aiming for the stars‘. Every young person would be ‘aiming for the stars‘ and so what, one or two may not make it to a truly aspirational outcome but I bet you one thing, that they ‘land on the moon‘! Now that would be a truly great aspirational outcome wouldn’t it?



5 thoughts on “If I Could Be The Education Secretary…

  1. This treats knowledge as unnecessary – which it isn’t. Also how does differentiation fit into this? Differentiation by outcome is discouraged in many fields.


    • Thank you for your comment. Although I would like to point that I fully accept that ‘Knowledge’ is a skill which is needed for an academic pathway. Which I did mention as a suitable pathway in KS4 if that suits the individual. Also; if it is a skill, which it is, then it fits nicely into this plan. How would a young person be able to access exams without knowledge development being built into skills development? Please understand that unless I went into a piece that is 1000’s of words long it would be impossible to detail every skill that would be developed. The point was supposed to be to develop the skills first in order to learn better then the results would naturally follow… That’s my belief anyway. Thanks again for the comment. 🙂


  2. Is there a reason for following a less academic pathway prior to KS4? I think pushing the academic further and further up the phases is not helpful. In all honesty though I can see the way this is going to play itself out in the long run which is some institutions providing a more academic pathway from the beginning and others not. Fair enough about not wanting to write thousands of words though!!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It is perfect time to make some plans for the longer term and it’s time to be happy. I have read this put up and if I may just I want to recommend you few interesting things or tips. Perhaps you could write subsequent articles regarding this article. I want to read even more issues about it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s